Difference between revisions of "GEMS-gem5 SLICC Transition Guide"
DerekHower (talk | contribs) (First revision of SLICC transition page) |
DerekHower (talk | contribs) (Added description of SLICC machine python configuration) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
In the new version of SLICC for gem5, '''the Chip class no longer exists'''. The only C++ object that SLICC generates is the machine (and associated helper structs/classes like States). Notably, this means that non-generated code is now responsible for orchestrating the construction and initialization of machines. | In the new version of SLICC for gem5, '''the Chip class no longer exists'''. The only C++ object that SLICC generates is the machine (and associated helper structs/classes like States). Notably, this means that non-generated code is now responsible for orchestrating the construction and initialization of machines. | ||
− | In addition to removing the Chip class, the SLICC machines are also more modular now. Each machine can define parameters that are set at configuration time, allowing for the construction of heterogeneous memory system configurations. Also because of the enhanced configuration, any object used by a SLICC machine that can itself be configured (i.e., is a SimObject) must be passed as a parameter rather than created by the machine so that the object can be initialized properly by the configuration system. You'll notice this, for example, in machines that accept a Sequencer object as a parameter. | + | In addition to removing the Chip class, the SLICC machines are also more modular now. Each machine can define parameters that are set at configuration time, allowing for the construction of heterogeneous memory system configurations. Also because of the enhanced configuration, any object used by a SLICC machine that can itself be configured (i.e., is a SimObject) must be passed as a parameter rather than created by the machine so that the object can be initialized properly by the configuration system. You'll notice this, for example, in machines that accept a Sequencer object as a parameter. Parameters to a protocol are set in Python at configuration time (more details below). |
= Details = | = Details = | ||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
int to_l2_latency = 1 | int to_l2_latency = 1 | ||
{ ... } | { ... } | ||
+ | |||
+ | Each protocol has an associated Python file in configs/ruby/ that is responsible for passing parameters to controllers. For example, below is a snippit from configs/ruby/MESI_CMP_directory.py that corresponds to the machine definition above: | ||
+ | |||
+ | l1_cntrl = L1Cache_Controller(version = i, | ||
+ | cntrl_id = cntrl_count, | ||
+ | sequencer = cpu_seq, | ||
+ | L1IcacheMemory = l1i_cache, | ||
+ | L1DcacheMemory = l1d_cache, | ||
+ | l2_select_num_bits = l2_bits) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Any parameter that is a SimObject (e.g., l1d_cache) is converted to a pointer type before being passed to SLICC. | ||
+ | |||
== Latencies == | == Latencies == |
Revision as of 16:11, 10 June 2011
This page covers the relevant changes that have been made to SLICC since the last and final GEMS release (2.1). It can be used as a guide to port SLICC protocols that formerly worked in GEMS to gem5.
Contents
Reasoning
Most changes to the SLICC language were made in order to support new features of gem5, including the parameterized object model (SimObject), atomic instruction support, and others. All syntactic changes are relatively simple and mechanical.
High Level Changes
The major conceptual change that occurred in the gem5 transition relates to the classes that SLICC generates. Previously, SLICC would generate a C++ class for each machine as well as a Chip class that served as a container for objects that roughly belonged "on-chip". The Chip class was responsible for defining, constructing, and initializing each machine (e.g., L1Cache_Controller) and related objects.
In the new version of SLICC for gem5, the Chip class no longer exists. The only C++ object that SLICC generates is the machine (and associated helper structs/classes like States). Notably, this means that non-generated code is now responsible for orchestrating the construction and initialization of machines.
In addition to removing the Chip class, the SLICC machines are also more modular now. Each machine can define parameters that are set at configuration time, allowing for the construction of heterogeneous memory system configurations. Also because of the enhanced configuration, any object used by a SLICC machine that can itself be configured (i.e., is a SimObject) must be passed as a parameter rather than created by the machine so that the object can be initialized properly by the configuration system. You'll notice this, for example, in machines that accept a Sequencer object as a parameter. Parameters to a protocol are set in Python at configuration time (more details below).
Details
Protocol Parameters
SLICC machine definitions have been modified to fit better into the gem5 object model. Parameters are defined between the machine definition and body, like so:
machine(Name, desc) : <parameter list> { body }
Parameters can be any type SLICC knows about, whether it be a primitive or external_type. Typically, parameters will include latencies, SimObjects used by the machine (e.g., Sequencer, CacheMemory), and possibly other protocol-specific parameters.
Parameters are declared with a type, and can optionally take a default value:
machine(L1Cache, "MSI Directory L1 Cache CMP") : Sequencer * sequencer, CacheMemory * L1IcacheMemory, CacheMemory * L1DcacheMemory, int l2_select_num_bits, int l1_request_latency = 2, int l1_response_latency = 2, int to_l2_latency = 1 { ... }
Each protocol has an associated Python file in configs/ruby/ that is responsible for passing parameters to controllers. For example, below is a snippit from configs/ruby/MESI_CMP_directory.py that corresponds to the machine definition above:
l1_cntrl = L1Cache_Controller(version = i, cntrl_id = cntrl_count, sequencer = cpu_seq, L1IcacheMemory = l1i_cache, L1DcacheMemory = l1d_cache, l2_select_num_bits = l2_bits)
Any parameter that is a SimObject (e.g., l1d_cache) is converted to a pointer type before being passed to SLICC.
Latencies
Previously, latencies were in an enqueue function as a string corresponding to a parameter in the Ruby configuration file. Now, latencies are integer parameters and the latency= portion of enqueue takes an integer rather than a string.
enqueue(requestIntraChipL1Network_out, RequestMsg, latency=l1_request_latency) { ... }
Atomic Instruction Support
Because Ruby/gem5 must now correctly account for data, SLICC protocols have support for handling atomic (Read-Modify-Write) accesses. Most of that functionality is hidden in the generated code, but SLICC protocol writers are responsible for identifying which field in a message contains the address to block on. This is done using the block_on parameter to the peek function used in an in port. For example, the line
peek(responseIntraChipNetwork_in, ResponseMsg, block_on="Address") { ... }
tells the generated controller that when an atomic access occurs, to use the field ResponseMsg:Address as the address for comparison.
State Declarations
States are now declared using a special state_declaration function rather than a generic enumeration function as was done previously. Additionally, AccessPermissions are now directly tied to states. For example:
state_declaration(State, desc="...", default="L1Cache_State_I") { NP, AccessPermission:Invalid, desc="Not present in either cache"; I, AccessPermission:Invalid, desc="a L1 cache entry Idle"; S, AccessPermission:Read_Only, desc="a L1 cache entry Shared"; E, AccessPermission:Read_Only, desc="a L1 cache entry Exclusive"; M, AccessPermission:Read_Write, desc="a L1 cache entry Modified", format="!b"; }
The format= option is also new to SLICC, and does <TODO: what does this do?>.
Entry Types and Casting
Cache entry definitions are now properly abstracted. Rather than relying on the convention that all protocols name fields of their cache entries the same, the common parts of a cache entry needed by CacheMemory to function (e.g., Address or locked) are declared in the non-generated AbstractCacheEntry class. Entries defined in a SLICC machine must inherit from that abstract class in order to be usable by CacheMemory.
As a consequence of inheriting from an abstract object inside of SLICC, we've also added a mechanism to cache to the correct entry type using static_cast.
Example
structure(Entry, desc="...", interface="AbstractCacheEntry") { State CacheState, desc="cache state"; ... }
An entry can later be used:
Entry getL1DCacheEntry(Address addr), return_by_pointer="yes" { Entry L1Dcache_entry := static_cast(Entry, "pointer", L1DcacheMemory[addr]); return L1Dcache_entry; }