Managing Local Changes with Mercurial Queues

Repository Management Problem

gem5 users typically opt to freeze their repository at a particular changeset when starting a new research project. This approach has several downsides:

• It discourages users from contributing back any useful changes they may develop.
• If a useful change is added upstream, it's a long, tedious process to update.

If a user chooses to keep their local repository up-to-date with the source tree they typically use named branches and merge any upstream changes into their branches. This approach also has its downsides:

• If any local change needs to be updated, it requires a separate commit.